Legal Opinion

Hartlepp v. Whitely, Fasler & Kelly Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1891No. 15,083PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Tippecanoe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

The complaint by the appellees, in this action, was to set aside a conveyance of the real estate described therein, alleged to have been fraudulently made to appellants by one Kasper Hartlepp, who was a co-defendant in the court below.

The cause was tried by the court without a jury, and the court, at the request of the appellants, made a special finding of facts, and stated conclusions of law thereon.

*544The appellant excepted to the conclusions of law as stated by the court. The appellants also moved the court for a judgment in their favor on the special finding of facts, which was overruled,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Clark v. State ex rel. WeirIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Brumbaugh v. RichcreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Wray v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burnett v. MilnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Thompson v. Connecticut Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Nevers v. HackIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. North British Mercantile Insurance v. KoontzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Apple v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API