Legal Opinion

Nevers v. Hack

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1894No. 16,870PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Lake Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

The appellant, as a creditor of the appellee Angeline Flack, sued her and her co-appellees John M. Hack and Joseph L. Hack, to set aside an alleged fraudulent conveyance to each of the two latter, by said Angeline, and subject the real estate so conveyed to satisfy appellant’s debt. Issues were formed, on which a trial resulted -in a finding and judgment in favor of appellees that appellant take nothing by his suit, and for costs.

The action of the court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial is assigned for error, and is the only error complained of here. The only grounds assigned…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Strong v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  2. Sherman v. HoglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Bruker v. KelseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Price v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Romine v. RomineIndiana Supreme Court · 1877

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Deming Hotel Co. v. SissonIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Coleman v. HageySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Jackson v. Farmers State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Oklahoma Nat. Bank v. CobbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Culp v. TrentSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API