Legal Opinion

Casey v. MacRae

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1928No. 21131. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff in this action seeks to recover judgment for services which he claims to have performed under a contract between himself and the defendant Hector F. MacRae, whereby Mr. MacRae agreed to pay plaintiff a commission of $1,000 in the event that plaintiff should find a purchaser for certain property belonging to defendants. In his complaint, plaintiff also alleges, as part of the same cause of action upon which he seeks recovery for the amount which he alleges he earned by way of a commission, that he performed services for defendant of the reasonable value of more than $1,000, no part…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Holden v. RomanoWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. McCreery v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Queen City Bank v. DanzWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Seattle v. Lake Union Brick Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API