Holden v. Romano
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Sheeks, J., entered February 28, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, -after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to cancel a deed.
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from a decree cancelling a deed obtained through fraud. The case comes here on the judgment roll, without a statement of facts or bill of exceptions, and but two errors are assigned: First, that the findings of fact and conclusions of law are inconsistent with the cause of action set forth in the complaint; and second, that the findings of fact do not support the conclusions of law and decree. We find no merit in either of these assignments. The contention that the action was prosecuted solely on the theory that the deed was obtained from the respondent while intoxicated is…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Clambey v. CoplandWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilkeson v. Rector, Wardens & Vestry of St. Luke's ParishWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- McCreery v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Whitney Chevrolet Co. v. HatchWashington Supreme Court · 1928
- Gregg v. GreggWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Church v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.