Legal Opinion

Queen City Bank v. Danz

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1928No. 21049. Department TwoPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

— This action is based upon a promissory note. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment of dismissal from which the plaintiff appeals.

No bill of exceptions or statement of facts has been brought to this court. The only question, therefore, is whether the findings support the judgment. The complaint alleged that the appellant held the note as collateral security. The findings recite that the appellant was the owner and in possession of the note. Whether, when the complaint alleges that a note is held as collateral security and the evidence shows that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Holden v. RomanoWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Pierce v. PierceWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. McCreery v. CarterWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Whitney Chevrolet Co. v. HatchWashington Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Casey v. MacRaeWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API