McGlone v. Contract Callers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael McGlone (“McGlone” or the “Plaintiff’) has moved pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) for conditional certification to proceed collectively in this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FSLA”) action against Contract Callers, Inc. (“CCI”), Michael McGuire (“McGuire”) and William “Tim” Wertz (‘Wertz”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). Based upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
Prior Proceedings
The complaint in this action was filed on May 3, 2011 alleging violations of the FLSA of 1938, as amended, 29…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Lynch v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Jackson v. Bloomberg, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Valerio v. RNC Industries, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
- Knox v. John Varvatos Enters. Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Bergman v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
- Yap v. Mooncake Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.