Legal Opinion

McGlone v. Contract Callers, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 9, 2012No. 11 Civ. 3004PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michael McGlone (“McGlone” or the “Plaintiff’) has moved pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) for conditional certification to proceed collectively in this Fair Labor Standards Act (“FSLA”) action against Contract Callers, Inc. (“CCI”), Michael McGuire (“McGuire”) and William “Tim” Wertz (‘Wertz”) (collectively, the “Defendants”). Based upon the facts and conclusions set forth below, the motion is granted in part and denied in part.

Prior Proceedings

The complaint in this action was filed on May 3, 2011 alleging violations of the FLSA of 1938, as amended, 29…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  4. Lynch v. United Services Automobile Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
  5. Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Bloomberg, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Valerio v. RNC Industries, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2016
  3. Knox v. John Varvatos Enters. Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
  4. Bergman v. Kindred Healthcare, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  5. Yap v. Mooncake Foods, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API