Legal Opinion

In re the Welfare of A.S.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 5, 2016No. A15-1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SMITH, TRACY M., Judge.

After pleading guilty to underage, drinking and driving and being placed on probation with certain conditions for up to 12 months, appellant A.S. moved for findings as a prerequisite to applying for SIJ status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(27)(J)(2012). The district court found that its jurisdiction over A.S.’s juvenile traffic offense and the court’s placement of A.S. on probation does not render A.S. “dependent on a juvenile court” or result in A.S. being “committed to, or placed under the' custody of,” a state agency or department or an individual or entity for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lietz v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. City of Brainerd v. Brainerd Investments PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  3. Marriage of Rubey v. VannettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  4. Lee v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  5. In re Ashley W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. De Guardado v. Guardado MenjivarCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. In re Jose H.New York Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API