Legal Opinion
United States v. Winckelmann
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided December 12, 2011No. 11-0280/ARPublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN delivered the opinion of the Court.
We granted the petition for review to determine whether the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals (ACCA) erred in affirming the finding of guilty as to Specification 3 of Charge III, attempted enticement of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) (2006), and whether the ACCA erred in affirming the forfeiture of all pay and allowances. 1 We hold that the lower court erred in both instances. First, under the facts of this case, the line “u free tonight” did not constitute a substantial step toward enticement of a minor. The evidence…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. FoslerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
- United States v. Resendiz-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. WinckelmannCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. PayneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- United States v. SchellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
- United States v. SpicerCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2013
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.