Legal Opinion
Chicanos Por La Causa, Inc. v. Napolitano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 9, 2009No. 07-17272, 07-17274, 08-15357, 08-15359, 08-15360PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION
ORDER
The Opinion filed on September 17, 2008, and appearing at 544 F.3d 976, is amended as follows: on slip Opinion page 13076, lines 21-22, change heading “B.” to read:
B. The Act’s -provisions mandating the use ofE-Verify and creating potentially harsh sanctions are not impliedly preempted by federal law.
The Opinion filed on September 17, 2008, and appearing at 544 F.3d 976, is further amended as follows: on slip Opinion page 13078, line 14, insert the following text:
Plaintiffs also argue that the Act’s potential sanctions of suspension or revocation of an employer’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. WhitingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Reid v. Johnson & Johnson & McNeil Nutritionals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Satomi Owners Ass'n v. Satomi, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- James Kroessler v. Cvs Health CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.