Legal Opinion
Marshall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewage Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 15, 2003No. Civil Action No. 01-1915 (HHK/JMF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
In my Memorandum Opinion of March 18, 2003, I ordered that the defendant produce for my in camera inspection all documents as to which it claimed either the attorney-client or work-product privileges. Marshall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewage Auth., 214 F.R.D. 23, 25 (D.D.C.2003). Defendant has narrowed its privilege claims to certain documents that plaintiff had demanded by seeking all documents used in preparing the defendant’s answers to plaintiffs interrogatories. I have now reviewed the documents. I conclude that some of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Marshall v. District of Columbia Water & Sewage AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2025