Legal Opinion
Calamco v. J.R. Simplot Co.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided August 25, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01201Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CALAMCO, No. 2:21-cv-01201-KJM-CSK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 J.R. Simplot Company, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 And related counterclaims. 18 19 20 Plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Calamco moves to bar defendant and counterclaim- 21 plaintiff J.R. Simplot Company from offering the opinions of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D., its retained 22 damages expert, at trial. As explained in this order, Simplot did not disclose the theory of 23 damages its expert ultimately relied on to form his opinions, as…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Andrew H.K. Wong v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.