Legal Opinion

James v. Amarillo City Light & Water Co.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 7, 1918No. 142PublishedCited by 9 opinions

At Law. Action by Lena De Boe James against the Amarillo City Light & Water Company, begun in the state court and removed to the federal court. On motion to remand.

1Opinion of the Court

ERVIN, District Judge.

This case was brought in a state court of Texas by petitioner under a Texas statute providing that an action to recover damages may be brought in case of the death of a party caused by the wrongful act of another; this statute, authorizing one to sue for the benefit of all, but requiring all beneficiaries to be named. The petition shows that some of the beneficiaries in this cause are resident citizens of Texas, while some are resident citizens of Kentucky.

[1] The defendant is a corporation, doing business in the state of Texas, but incorporated under the laws of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte SchollenbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  4. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Smith v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lee v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Matarazzo v. HustisDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1919
  3. Isaac Kubie Co. v. Lehigh Valley R.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1919
  4. Boise Commercial Club v. Oregon Short Line R.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1919
  5. Nickels v. Pullman Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API