Legal Opinion

Isaac Kubie Co. v. Lehigh Valley R.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided December 26, 1919PublishedCited by 8 opinions

At Law. Action by the Isaac Kubie Company and the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company against the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company. On motion to remand to state court.

1Opinion of the Court

RELLSTAB, District Judge.

This suit is to recover damages for the loss by fire of raw sugar alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of the defendant. One of the asserted grounds of negligence is that the defendant did not comply with the regulations of the Interstate Commerce Commission, prescribed for the handling and storing of explosives. The amount in controversy exceeds $200,-000.

Isaac Kubie Company, one of the plaintiffs, is a corporation and citizen of the state of New York, and was the owner of the sugar at the time of its loss. The sugar was partly insured by the Liverpool &…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. In Re MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Ex Parte WisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Ex Parte HardingSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Butte & Boston Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Boncek v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1952
  2. Neiswonger v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1929
  3. Blundell v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Bullock v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
  5. Mozingo v. Consolidated Construction CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API