Legal Opinion
Jeffers v. Clinton
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided August 13, 1992No. H-C-89-004PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
We have before us the defendants’ motion for an extension of time within which to file an amended notice of appeal. For the reasons given below, the motion is denied.
We filed our opinion and order awarding the plaintiffs their attorneys’ fees and expenses on October 24, 1991. 776 F.Supp. 465 (E.D.Ark.). The defendants incorrectly appealed from that order to the Supreme Court of the United States. On March 23, 1992, the Supreme Court vacated the judgment and remanded the case to us “with instructions to enter a fresh judgment from which an appeal may be taken to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Donald A. Vogelsang v. Patterson Dental Company, a Delaware Corporation, Pda, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Bartunek v. BubakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Jeffers v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dickinson v. Indiana State Election BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992