Legal Opinion

Jeffers v. Clinton

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided October 24, 1991No. H-C-89-004PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

We have before us plaintiffs’ final motion for attorneys’ fees and expenses. Over two years ago the plaintiffs filed this lawsuit challenging the apportionment of the General Assembly of Arkansas. They argued that the redrawing of legislative districts after the 1980 census violated the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq., and the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments. After a twelve-day trial, the Court found that the plaintiffs had proved that the 1981 reapportionment decreased the opportunity for meaningful minority participation in state politics. Jeffers v.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Venegas v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. Indiana State Election BoardDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1992
  2. Jeffers v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
  3. Jeffers v. ClintonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1991
  4. Jeffers v. TuckerDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API