Legal Opinion

Van Meter v. Barnett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1889No. 13,567PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Erom the Jackson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Berkshire, J. —

This is an action in replevin, and originated before a justice of the peace. There are two errors assigned, as follows: 1. The court erred in overruling the-motion for a new trial. 2. The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to modify the judgment.

There are several reasons assigned in the motion for á new trial. The sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth reasons-relate to the instructions given and refused by the court. The instructions are not embraced in the record, either by a bill of exceptions or as provided in section 533, R. S. 1881 (see Olds v. Deckman, 98 Ind.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Jenks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Pitzer v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Everman v. HymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Ellebarger v. SwiggettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Tolbert v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API