Van Meter v. Barnett
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom the Jackson Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Berkshire, J. —
This is an action in replevin, and originated before a justice of the peace. There are two errors assigned, as follows: 1. The court erred in overruling the-motion for a new trial. 2. The court erred in overruling appellant’s motion to modify the judgment.
There are several reasons assigned in the motion for á new trial. The sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth and tenth reasons-relate to the instructions given and refused by the court. The instructions are not embraced in the record, either by a bill of exceptions or as provided in section 533, R. S. 1881 (see Olds v. Deckman, 98 Ind.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Bosseker v. CramerIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Ex parte WallsIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Robinson Machine Works v. ChandlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Jenks v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Pitzer v. Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1881
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Everman v. HymanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Ellebarger v. SwiggettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
- Tolbert v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900