Legal Opinion

Everman v. Hyman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1892No. 242PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

New, J. —

This is an action of replevin, instituted by the appellant against the appellee before a justice of the peace, to obtain possession of a horse.

*460Before the justice judgment was in favor of the appellant. Upon appeal to the circuit court there was, over the appellant’s motion for a new trial, judgment for the appellee in the following words:

££ It is therefore considered and adjudged by the court that the defendant was lawfully in the possession of the property mentioned and described in plaintiff’s complaint, to wit, one gray horse, at the date of the commencement of said action, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fisher v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Elder v. RouseNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Butler & Vosburgh v. MillerNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
  4. Fairbank v. Merchants' National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Van Meter v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. McClaughry v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  2. Ralls County v. StephensMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  3. Tobin v. McCombCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. MacFarlane v. BlochOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Bedford Belt Railway Co. v. BurkeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API