People v. Williams
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHIN, J.
For over 60 years, this court described the statute of limitations as limiting the court’s subject matter jurisdiction and said that trial courts could not proceed in a time-barred case. (E.g., People v. McGee (1934) 1 Cal.2d 611 [36 P.2d 378] (McGee); People v. Chadd (1981) 28 Cal.3d 739, 756-757 [170 Cal.Rptr. 798, 621 P.2d 837] (Chadd).) Accordingly, “this court and the Courts of Appeal have repeatedly held that a defendant may assert the statute of limitations at any time.” (Cowan v. Superior Court (1996) 14 Cal.4th 367, 371 [58 Cal.Rptr.2d 458, 926 P.2d 438] (Cowan).) In…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ChaddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- People v. HollowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- People v. SimonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. DaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.