Legal Opinion

Davis v. Municipal Court for San Francisco Judicial District

California Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1988No. S.F. 24900PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARGUELLES, J.

In recent years, the Legislature has enacted a number of statutory provisions which recognize the authority of local entities to adopt pretrial diversion programs for persons charged with misdemeanors. (See, e.g., Pen. Code, §§ 1001-1001.9, 1001.50-1001.55.)1 In this case we must determine the validity of one of the central features of these misdemeanor diversion statutes—a provision granting a local district attorney the authority to approve or disapprove a local diversion program (§§ 1001.2, subd. (b), 1001.50, subd. (b))—as well as the validity of one specific *70provision…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API