Davis v. Municipal Court for San Francisco Judicial District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARGUELLES, J.
In recent years, the Legislature has enacted a number of statutory provisions which recognize the authority of local entities to adopt pretrial diversion programs for persons charged with misdemeanors. (See, e.g., Pen. Code, §§ 1001-1001.9, 1001.50-1001.55.)1 In this case we must determine the validity of one of the central features of these misdemeanor diversion statutes—a provision granting a local district attorney the authority to approve or disapprove a local diversion program (§§ 1001.2, subd. (b), 1001.50, subd. (b))—as well as the validity of one specific *70provision…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Butt v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.