In re Martin

This disciplinary action is based on eight client complaints charging respondent with gross negligence, neglect, and other unethical conduct. Those complaints resulted in four separate recommendations by the District V-A Ethics Committee. The *240Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) consolidated those matters for oral argument and determined that respondent was grossly negligent in the representation of his client in seven of the eight cases reviewed, and that respondent engaged in a pattern of neglect. Moreover, the DRB found that respondent engaged in other unethical conduct, including…