Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Gambrell v. Hess

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 14, 1991No. Civ. A. 90-3959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

VANARTSDALEN, Senior District Judge.

Defendants Leon Hess (Hess) and Harold Ackerman (Ackerman) have filed motions for summary judgment. They also request that sanctions be imposed upon plaintiff, Doris McKinney Gambrell (Gambrell), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 and that she be enjoined from filing further actions against them pertaining to her termination of employment from the Amerada Hess Corporation without first seeking leave of court. For the reasons stated herein, I will grant the motions.

I. Facts and Procedural History

Disposition of the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Berwind Corp. v. ApfelDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Williams v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Mallon v. PadovaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Gambrell (Doris McKinney v. Hess (Leon), Owner of Amerada Hess Corporation, Martin (Arthur N., Jr.), Ackerman (Judge Harold)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API