Legal Opinion

Bass v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1992No. 12PA91PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRYE, Justice.

The sole issue presented on appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage is available under a policy issued to a named insured, when the vehicle owned by the named insured and involved in his injuries is insured under a separate policy not containing UIM coverage. We hold that the Court of Appeals did not err.

Plaintiff was permanently injured when his 1986 Honda motorcycle was struck by an automobile driven by Manuel Tyson. Plaintiff insured the Honda motorcycle with State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. No UIM…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Crowder v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  3. Bass v. N.C. Farm Bureau Mut. Ins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Bass v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Bass v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MabeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Harris v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Bray v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  5. NC Farm Bureau, Mut. Ins. Co. v. BostCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API