Legal Opinion

State Board of Agriculture v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1923No. Calendar 31,180PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The writ of mandamus is sought to compel the auditor general to issue his warrant on the State treasurer in favor of the Michigan Agricultural College for $75,000. The State administrative board is made a party defendant for the reason that the auditor general refuses to issue said warrant because said board has directed him not to do so.

This proceeding calls for a construction of Act No. 308, Pub. Acts 1923, which reads:

"For carrying on the co-operative agricultural extension work under the provisions of an act of congress approved May eight, nineteen hundred fourteen, entitled 'An act to…

2Cited by36 opinions

  1. Regents of the University of Michigan v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Federated Publications, Inc v. Michigan State University Board of TrusteesMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Civil Service Commission v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Fanning v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API