Legal Opinion

People v. Stegman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1985No. Crim. 16312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KAUFMAN, Acting P. J.

Defendant was charged by information with one count of possession of cocaine for sale, a violation of Health and Safety Code section 11351. Defendant pled not guilty. Defendant’s motion to suppress evidence pursuant to Penal Code section 1538.5 was denied. Defendant then withdrew his plea and entered a plea of guilty to the count charged. Defendant was sentenced to the middle term of three years. Defendant appeals, contending the trial court improperly denied his motion to suppress.

Facts

On May 21, 1982, at approximately 1 a.m., Riverside County Sheriff’s officers…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fare v. Tony C.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. People v. RameyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. MaddoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lorenzana v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. People v. SirhanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. DuncanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. IbarraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  3. In Re Frederick B.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. BairdCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API