Legal Opinion

Cheney v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1933No. 24676. Department OnePublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J.—

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court reversing an order of the joint board of the department of labor and industries rejecting a claim.

E. M. Cheney resided in Lewis county, where he was engaged in the business of manufacturing what are called cedar shakes. When he would receive an order for a carload of shakes, he would employ a crew and proceed to manufacture and ship them in response to the order. During the first half of the year 1931, there was no demand for shakes, and none was manufactured by Mr. Cheney. A few days prior to August 1st of that year, he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. HarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  2. Hillestad v. Industrial Insurance CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. American Products Co. v. VillwockWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Peterson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Spier v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Dry v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API