Legal Opinion
United States v. Thomas Herbert McIlvain
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1992No. 91-6113PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHERMAN G. FINESILVER, Chief District Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
I
The issue involved in this appeal concerns review of an order of restitution entered by the district court upon sentencing. The specific question presented is whether the trial court erred in ordering restitution in the absence of evidence establishing Defendant’s financial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Marilyn Kay KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Bruce Howard Rogat and Margo Kay RogatCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Monty Phillip McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Dennis Ray Paden, William M. Headrick Ii, and Robert BoydCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Billy MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Charles William KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BornfieldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jo Lynn PattyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Michael F. LogarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.