Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Bruce Howard Rogat and Margo Kay Rogat

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 29, 1991No. 90-1052, 90-1053PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TACHA, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellants Margo Kay Rogat and Bruce Howard Rogat appeal from a district court order requiring them to pay $2,449,142.48 in restitution. They contend the order constituted an abuse of discretion because the court failed to adequately consider their current indigency. We affirm.

The appellants pleaded guilty to various fraud charges. Margo Rogat pleaded guilty to four misdemeanor counts. She received a sentence of six months’ imprisonment and five years’ probation. Bruce Rogat pleaded guilty to two felony counts. He received a sentence of three years’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph PalmaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Anderson AtkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Monty Phillip McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Leland L. StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Danny Lee TeeheeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. LucasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. United States v. NicholsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. Paul J. SavoieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. Charles William KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Marilyn Kay KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API