Legal Opinion
United States v. Jo Lynn Patty
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 27, 1993No. 92-5078PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Defendant Jo Lynn Patty appeals the restitution portion of her sentence, claiming that the district court improperly included attorney fees and prejudgment interest in its restitution order as to certain victims, that the government failed to show that Defendant’s fraudulent acts caused some of the victims’ losses, and that the sentencing court abused its discretion in determining that Defendant had the ability to pay the restitution award. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a).
From the time she was twenty until the businesses declared bankruptcy seventeen…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Peter Arvanitis, Stanley Peters, John Yannakis, Perikles Panagiotaros, and Robert RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Josephine L. Broughton-Jones, A/K/A Josie BroughtonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Robert S. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,709 United States of America v. Christopher Arutunoff, United States of America v. Steven J. Devries, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Charles William KunzmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Frymire v. Ampex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.