City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLEMING, Judge.
Appellant City of St. Paul brought an action for a declaratory judgment to the effect that respondent NSP had violated its franchise agreement with the city by entering into -contracts with retail customers of respondents EGM and Centran to transport natural gas through NSP pipelines from a point outside the city to the customers within city limits. The natural gas in question was sold by EGM and Centran to the St. Paul customers with the express understanding that the gas was to be delivered to the customer at NSP’s “town border station” (TBS) outside the city limits.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Grondahl v. BulluckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990