Legal Opinion
City of Saint Paul v. Northern States Power Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 2, 1990No. C5-89-1687PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YETKA, Justice.
This case arises from an action brought by the City of St. Paul seeking a declaratory judgment that the appellants Centran Corporation and Enron Gas Marketing, Inc. (EGM) obtain a franchise to sell natural gas to end users within the city. St. Paul also sought to enjoin appellant Northern States Power (NSP) from transporting natural gas owned by others to end users through its gas lines within the city. On cross motions for summary judgment (St. Paul sought partial summary judgment), the district court ordered judgment for the appellants. The court of appeals affirmed the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Northwest Central Pipeline Corp. v. State Corporation Comm'n of Kan.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Cohasset v. Minnesota PowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- City of Cohasset v. Minnesota PowerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- U S West Communications, Inc. v. City of Redwood FallsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- City of Cohasset v. Minnesota PowerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010