Legal Opinion
In Re Celexa & Lexapro Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 10, 2010No. MDL 09-02067-NMGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
GORTON, J.
Plaintiffs Scott A. Wilcox (“Wilcox”), Angela Jaeckel, et al. (“Jaeckel”), Martha Palumbo, et al. (“Palumbo”), Municipal Reinsurance Health Insurance Fund, et al. (“Municipal Reinsurance”) and New Mexico UFCW Union’s and Employers’ Health Welfare Trust Fund, et al. (“NM UFCW”) have brought suit against Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Forest”). Before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by the defendants on three grounds: lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), failure to state a claim upon which relief…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Hydroxycut Marketing & Sales Practices Lit.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- In re Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Co. Mktg. & Sales Practices & Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
- Depianti v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2014
- Dremak v. Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2011
- In Re Celexa & Lexapro Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011