Legal Opinion

In Re Celexa & Lexapro Marketing & Sales Practices Litigation

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 11, 2011No. MDL 09-02067-NMGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

memorandum: & order

GORTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Scott A. Wilcox (‘Wilcox”), Jaeckel et al. (“Jaeckel”) and Palumbo et al. (“Palumbo”) bring suit against Forest Laboratories, Inc. and Forest Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Forest”). The cases have been consolidated into a multi-district litigation and assigned to this Session of this District Court for pre-trial motion practice and discovery.

On November 10, 2010, 751 F.Supp.2d 277, 2010 WL 4644429 (D.Mass.2010), the Court dismissed Wilcox’s First Amended Complaint without prejudice for failure to plead facts demonstrating that his claims were not…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Romano v. Rockwell International, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Warner Chilcott PLLDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API