Legal Opinion
Dremak v. Iovate Health Sciences Group, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 31, 2011No. Case No. 09md2087 BTM (CAB); S.D. Cal. No. 09cv1088PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS THE FIRST CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
BARRY TED MOSKOWITZ, District Judge.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1), 12(b)(6), and 9(b), defendants Iovate Health Sciences, Inc. and Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., (“Manufacturer Defendants” or “Iovate”) and GNC Corporation, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreens Company, CVS Caremark Corp., and Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc. (“Retailer Defendants”) have filed a motion to dismiss the First Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint. Defendants BJ’s Wholesale Club,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Hydroxycut Marketing & Sales Practices Lit.District Court, S.D. California · 2011