Boyd v. Boyd
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
I
By his first argument defendant brings forward four assignments of error grounded upon eleven exceptions to the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the court’s order. The basis of his argument is that since the parties had agreed in their separation agreement as to the amount which defendant would pay for support of the children, the court was not warranted in increasing that amount in the absence of proof by plaintiff and a finding by the court that circumstances relating to the reasonable needs of the children had substantially changed between the date of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Quick v. QuickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Fuchs v. FuchsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Crosby v. CrosbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Hudson v. HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Price v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Cameron v. CameronCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Powers v. ParisherCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- Holderness v. HoldernessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.