Legal Opinion

Holderness v. Holderness

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 2, 1988No. 8818DC109PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

Defendant brings forward several assignments of error and puts forth as his primary argument the trial court’s failure to make adequate findings of fact and conclusions of law. He contends that the court’s findings of fact are inadequate to support its conclusions as to the amount reasonably required for the support of the children, defendant’s ability to pay that amount and plaintiffs ability to contribute to such support. We agree.

In an action to modify child support provisions of a separation agreement which has not previously been incorporated into an order of judgment of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coble v. CobleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Plott v. PlottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Newman v. NewmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Atwell v. AtwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. Boyd v. BoydCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API