Legal Opinion

Ashley v. Monsanto

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided December 21, 1999No. 93,133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOODMAN, Vice Chief Judge:

€ 1 This is a proceeding to review an order of a Workers' Compensation Court three-judge panel affirming the trial court's order denying the claimant's claim. The issue is whether competent evidence supports the conclusion that the claimant was injured as a result of his willful failure to use a mandatory procedure to guard against such injuries. Based upon our review of the record and applicable law, we vacate the order and remand for further proceedings.

I

T2 Claimant Raymond Lee Ashley filed his Form 3 April 16, 1997, alleging he injured his left hand, arm,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Wise-Buchanan Coal Co. v. RaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Newquist v. Hall Building Products, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2004
  2. RENFRO ELECTRIC v. SEXTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
  3. Cox Communications v. WilliamsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
  4. RENFRO ELECTRIC v. SEXTONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API