Legal Opinion

Catlin v. Prairie Marketing

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1991No. 91-040PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, C.J.

Plaintiff, Frank Catlin, appeals an order of dismissal entered by a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court. Compensation was sought by the plaintiff for back injuries he alleged arose from his employment by the defendant, Prairie Marketing. The compensation court found that plaintiff failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he suffered an accident as that term is defined in Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-151(2) (Reissue 1988). We affirm.

This court will not set aside factual determinations by the Workers’ Compensation Court unless those determinations are clearly erroneous.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. MacK v. Dale Electronics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Hamer v. HenryNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Tarvin v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Masters v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Frank v. a & L INSULATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Edmonds v. IBP, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Fowler v. Lester ElectricNebraska Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Bolita v. West Omaha Winsupply Co.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API