Legal Opinion

Hamer v. Henry

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1983No. 83-112PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

This is an appeal from the Nebraska Workmen’s Compensation Court which dismissed the plaintiff’s petition because he failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that his disability resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of employment, as defined by the Nebraska workmen’s compensation law.

The plaintiff, William Hamer, filed this action seeking an award for injuries sustained to his neck while he was working at Scotia Welding for the defendant, Travie Henry. A single-judge court determined that his injuries were compensable for temporary total disability through June…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacK v. Dale Electronics, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Davis v. Western ElectricNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Novotny v. Electric Hose & Rubber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Smith v. Fremont Contract Carriers, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Airport Inn, Inc. v. Nebraska Equal Opportunity CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hohnstein v. WC FRANKNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Hintz v. Farmers Co-op Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API