Legal Opinion

Owen v. American Hydraulics, Inc.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 2000No. S-99-686PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.

This workers’ compensation case is before us for the second time. In Owen v. American Hydraulics, 254 Neb. 685, 578 N.W.2d 57 (1998), we held that an award entered by the trial judge on December 12, 1996, did not comply with Workers’ Comp. Ct. R. of Proc. 11 (1995) in that it was ambiguous and contradictory and thus afforded no basis for meaningful appellate review. We remanded the cause to the trial judge with directions to enter an order in compliance with rule 11. On remand, the trial judge considered the same evidence which was before him at the time of the initial award and concluded…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sandel v. Packaging Co. of AmericaNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Hull v. Aetna InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Schlup v. Auburn Needleworks, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Frank v. a & L INSULATIONNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. US West Communications, Inc. v. TaborskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dawes v. Wittrock Sandblasting & Painting, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Logsdon v. ISCO CO.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Swanson v. Park Place AutomotiveNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Hintz v. Farmers Co-op Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Ludwick v. Triwest Healthcare Alliance and Physicians Clinic, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2004

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API