Legal Opinion

Tarvin v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1991No. 90-939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShanahan, J.

David R. Tarvin brought a workers’ compensation action against his employer, Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company, and against Cigna Property & Casualty Companies, which supplied workers’ compensation insurance coverage for Mutual. Tarvin’s action was based on his disabling depression and anxiety, which he claimed were aggravated by his “job-related mental and/or physical stresses, pressures, and activities.” At rehearing, the Nebraska Workers’ Compensation Court found that Tarvin failed to prove compensability of his condition and dismissed Tarvin’s action.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

Findings of fact…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Heiliger v. Walters & Heiliger Electric, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mendoza v. Omaha Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bekelski v. O. F. Neal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Fees v. Rivett Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Spangler v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Doe v. ZedekNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cox v. Fagen Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Renne v. MoserNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Zach v. Nebraska State PatrolNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Schmid v. Nebraska Intergovernmental Risk Management Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API