Sudeith v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Eespondent was an employe of relator on the date hereinafter referred to. His duties were to sprinkle the “greens” on relator’s golf course in Como Park. His hours of work were from six o’clock in the evening until two o’clock the next morning, Avith half an hour for lunch. He usually ate his lunch at the pavilion, and near midnight. A feAV minutes before midnight September 13, 1932, respondent, having finished his lunch at the pavilion, started to cross the pavement or boulevard to go to the toilet on the westerly side thereof, when he Avas struck by an automobile driven by one…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Milwaukee Western Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
- Kaletha v. Hall Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Krause v. SwartwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Henry v. D. A. Odell Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Simonds v. ReigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brusven v. BallordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Lassila v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974