Legal Opinion

Simonds v. Reigel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1926No. 25,034PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, C. J.

The Superway Construction Company was graveling part of State Highway No. 8. They procured gravel from a pit 4 miles west of Deer river and caused it to be hauled in motor trucks for distribution. Jake Reigel owned a team and he employed Levi Simonds, a teamster, to take the team and work for the construction company for $6.50 per day. The pay was divided equally between Simonds and Reigel. Simonds cared for the team and used it in the pit under directions of the contractor’s foreman. He lived at Deer River. He boarded at home. He could- have boarded at the camp near or at the pit. His hours…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hills v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Nesbitt v. Twin City Forge & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. McInerney v. Buffalo & Susquehanna RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Erickson v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Reed v. Bliss & Van Auken Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Speas v. Boone CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Simonson v. KnightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  3. Locke v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Nehring v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  5. Cavilla v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API