Legal Opinion

Krause v. Swartwood

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1928No. 26,427PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission denying compensation.

At the time of her alleged injury relator was employed in the office of the respondent Dr. F. A. Swartwood at Waseca. Her duties were those of office assistant and secretary to a physician and surgeon. Her “noon hour” was from 12 to 1, and it was her custom to go home for lunch. On May 26,-1926, at the request of Dr. Swartwood, who expected to be absent at midday, she lunched at a cafe near the office. Not only that, she arranged with the telephone central that all calls for the doctor, while she was absent from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sundine's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. Archibald v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Haller v. City of LansingMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Novack v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Holt Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gibberd Ex Rel. Gibberd v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Snyder v. General Paper CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  4. Locke v. County of SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  5. Corcoran v. PG Corcoran Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API