United States v. Schmidt
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused contends his conviction by a general court-martial at Camp Courtney, Okinawa, for numerous offenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, is invalid because the court-martial lacked jurisdiction to proceed, and his challenge of several court members for cause was determined by improper means.
Before the court-martial was formally convened, defense counsel examined the court members. He established that four of the seven members had read an article in the morning newspaper about a court-martial held the previous day. In response…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
- United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
- United States v. AdamiakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. NichelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. LenoirUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. ClarkeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. LoganU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. HoustonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967