Legal Opinion

United States v. Schmidt

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided April 22, 1966No. 19,096PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends his conviction by a general court-martial at Camp Courtney, Okinawa, for numerous offenses in violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, is invalid because the court-martial lacked jurisdiction to proceed, and his challenge of several court members for cause was determined by improper means.

Before the court-martial was formally convened, defense counsel examined the court members. He established that four of the seven members had read an article in the morning newspaper about a court-martial held the previous day. In response…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MickelUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. DicarioUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. AdamiakUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. United States v. RobinsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. ClevelandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. NichelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  2. United States v. LenoirUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. ClarkeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. LoganU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  5. United States v. HoustonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API