Perrott v. United States Banking Corporation
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
LEAHY, District Judge.
This is a stockholder’s derivative action. The complaint alleges the individual defendants have dominated the corporate defendant by diverting its earnings and assets to themselves, and utilizing their positions of trust as officers and directors in fraud of stockholders. Defendants challenge the adequacy of the complaint as to whether the modus operandi by which such control was acquired and the methods by which the fraudulent diversion of assets occurred are sufficiently spelled out with detail. Defendants filed six motions based upon various grounds. In view of the…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pusey & Jones Co. v. HanssenSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Keenan v. EshlemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1938
- Federal United Corp. v. HavenderSupreme Court of Delaware · 1940
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- In Re Glenfed, Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Subin v. GoldsmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Zahn v. Transamerica CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1948
- H F G Co. v. Pioneer Pub. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.