Legal Opinion

May v. . Grove

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 29, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClabKsoN, J.

The court below charged the jury as follows: “It has been stipulated or agreed, at least by the plaintiff, and the plaintiff only contends that the defendant, E. W. Grove (or rather E. W. Grove’s executors, the Grove estate), is liable at all except by and through the negligence of the defendant Collins, if you find by the greater weight of the evidence that the défendant Collins was negligent. In other words, the plaintiff does not’contend that E. W. Grove himself was negligent, or that he was negligent through any other employee than the employee Collins. Since the plaintiff has conceded…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  2. Tillett v. Lynchburg & Durham RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  3. Williams v. . HaidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Champion v. . DanielSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Kimbrough v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ShaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. Templeton v. . KelleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. In Re Sermon's LandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  5. Bailey v. . HaymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API