Legal Opinion

Theobald v. Nosser

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1999No. 1998-CA-01274-SCTPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

752 So.2d 1036 (1999)

Robert P. THEOBALD and Karleen D. Theobald

v.

Rusty NOSSER and Karen L. Nosser.

No. 1998-CA-01274-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

December 16, 1999.

David M. Sessums, Vicksburg, Attorney for Appellants.

William Allen Hood, A.J. `Buddy' Dees, Jr., W. Briggs Hopson, III, Vicksburg, Attorneys for Appellees.

BEFORE PRATHER, C.J., BANKS AND McRAE, JJ.

PRATHER, Chief Justice, for the Court:

I. INTRODUCTION

¶ 1. This Court is asked to determine whether an improperly executed promissory note, coupled with the actions of the parties, gave rise to a contract for the sale of a grocery…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Warwick v. MatheneyMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Leach v. TingleMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Grisham v. HintonMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hill v. ThompsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Osborne v. BullinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wilson v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Rotenberry v. HookerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Frierson v. Delta Outdoor, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Tupelo Redevelopment Agency v. AbernathyMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Hamilton v. HopkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API