Legal Opinion

Tupelo Redevelopment Agency v. Abernathy

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2005No. 2002-CA-01837-SCT, 2002-CA-01838-SCT, 2002-CA-01839-SCTPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

913 So.2d 278 (2005)

TUPELO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY

v.

Sue W. ABERNATHY, G.L. Wilemon, Jr., Joann W. Westmoreland, Donald Brett Bethay and Barry Lane Bethay.

Nos. 2002-CA-01837-SCT, 2002-CA-01838-SCT, 2002-CA-01839-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

April 7, 2005.

Martha Bost Stegall, Guy W. Mitchell, III, Tupelo, Attorneys for Appellant.

Dewitt T. Hicks, Jr., P. Nelson Smith, Jr., Columbus, Attorneys for Appellees.

Before WALLER, P.J., GRAVES and DICKINSON, JJ.

GRAVES, Justice, for the Court:

¶ 1. These consolidated appeals arise from eminent domain actions brought by the Tupelo Redevelopment Agency…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemoreMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  2. ROYER HOMES OF MS., INC. v. Chandeleur Homes, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Whitten v. CoxMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Cooper v. CrabbMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  5. IP TIMBERLANDS OPERATING CO. LTD. v. DenmissMississippi Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Upchurch Plumbing, Inc. v. Greenwood Utilities CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Urban Developers LLC v. City of Jackson MSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. Zumwalt v. Jones County Board of SupervisorsMississippi Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Harris v. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stockstill v. GammillMississippi Supreme Court · 2006

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API