Legal Opinion

Warwick v. Matheney

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1992No. 89-CA-0072PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

603 So.2d 330 (1992)

James E. WARWICK and Barbara Rhea Warwick

v.

Cecil B. MATHENEY.

No. 89-CA-0072.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

June 10, 1992.

Dana E. Kelly, Phelps Dunbar Firm, Jackson, for appellant.

Dale Hubbard, Ferrell & Hubbard, Jackson, and Mignon Mestayer DeLashmet, Mobile, Ala., for appellee.

En Banc.

HAWKINS, Presiding Justice, for the Court:

James E. Warwick and his wife Barbara Rhea Warwick appeal a jury verdict of $92,000 entered against them in a breach of contract action brought against them by Cecil B. Matheney in the circuit court of the First Judicial District of Hinds County.…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  4. Smith v. SandersMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Eastern Air Lines, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. Business Communications, Inc. v. BanksMississippi Supreme Court · 2012
  2. American Fire Protection, Inc. v. LewisMississippi Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Upchurch Plumbing, Inc. v. Greenwood Utilities CommissionMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Fred's Stores of Miss. v. M & H DRUGSMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Coho Resources, Inc. v. McCarthyMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API