Legal Opinion

Hellander v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 2, 1959No. Cong. 7-56PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages in the amount of $66,349.30 allegedly incurred by him in the performance of a contract with the Bureau of Reclamation for the construction of certain earthwork and structures for an irrigation project. His claim is in five counts: (1) as the result of faulty contract specifications, he incurred repair costs in order to build siphons that would not leak. Said repair costs were occasioned by reason of defendant’s use of the irrigation system before it was formally accepted; (2) that upon oral assurance of defendant’s agents that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Blair Ex Rel. Roanoke Marble & Granite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. A. L. Coupe Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
  3. P. J. Carlin Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Dunn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. J. G. Watts Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Inland Empire Builders, Inc., J. C. Boespflug Construction Co., and McLaughlin Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  3. Schutt Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  4. Harvey-Whipple, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  5. Paul v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API